Monday, 13 February 2017

We need to break cycle of racism

Racism and the politics and policies of race remain very much alive in the Malaysia of 2017. In fact, the divisive and polarising effects resulting from decades of racially discriminatory and preferential policies and practices have been perceived by many to have increased in recent years. This is in tandem with the increasing economic disparity experienced by all levels of society.

Letters
Monday, 13 February 2017
THERE’S a T-shirt produced by the NGO Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia which reads “RACISM is so yesterday”.
I wish it were the case but the reality is actually quite different.
Racism and the politics and policies of race remain very much alive in the Malaysia of 2017. In fact, the divisive and polarising effects resulting from decades of racially discriminatory and preferential policies and practices have been perceived by many to have increased in recent years. This is in tandem with the increasing economic disparity experienced by all levels of society.
This disparity becomes more polarising when communal leaders start looking for someone to blame for their failures, misfortunes and hardships. Racism and bigotry often feature prominently.
We have seen and continue to see job advertisements where a specific race is preferred. Similar conditions are placed on prospective tenants of rented apartments. From entrance into boarding schools and public universities to buying houses and property, and running a business, there are official and unofficial racial quotas.
Even taxi drivers have admitted to being racially biased despite the foolishness of the act. A driver once asked me, through the car window, what my race was before deciding that I was acceptable as I was of the same ethnicity as he.
The list goes on and on, causing tension, strain and suspicion on inter-community relations. We know these discriminatory behaviours and actions. We have experienced them. We might even have been guilty of committing some of them too.
Let’s face it: we are all products of racism in this country. Whether it is due to the family or communities we grew up in, or the social environment which continues to preserve, tolerate and even celebrate racial discrimination, none of us is entirely innocent.
But we can break this vicious cycle and choose a different path.
Recently, a Universiti Utara Malaysia professor, Datuk Zainal Kling, suggested that the blue identification card be withheld from children who are unable to converse in Bahasa Melayu. Overlooking the fact that this cruel discriminatory measure would victimise children who are not fortunate enough to be born and brought up in circumstances which enable them to gain proficiency in the Malay language, Prof. Zainal’s suggestion is arguably racist as it targets the non-Malay community.
It is also rooted in the Malay supremacist mindset which believes that Malaysian citizenship should be withdrawn or withheld from individuals who don’t act or conform to homogenous norms and expectations.
We need to continue to call out and condemn such repugnant suggestions and politics which target people because of their race or religion. We must not turn a blind eye. After all, racism begets racism.
We must be willing to talk about these issues and not sweep them under the “sensitive” carpet. As Khairy Jamaluddin recently called for, we must be willing to talk honestly and openly, not just in the comfort of our own kedai kopi circles but even with those who look different or bring a different perspective. Only then can we break this dangerous cycle.
There is no point in us indulging in misty-eyed maudlin reminiscences of the times during Tunku Abdul Rahman’s era when we are not willing to put in the effort to work and fight to preserve that way of life.
It requires moral courage, honesty and a fair amount of sacrifice.
After all, few people want to give away advantages that they have enjoyed as a result of simply being born into the right race or ethnicity. They also want the same for their family, children and even grandchildren. These are the sins of our fathers and we should do well to leave them behind for the sake of our future.
What we need to urgently do today is to make the practice of racism socially repugnant and repulsive, not celebrate it. I believe that it is not possible to progress as a nation or a people if we believe that it requires domination and emphasis on flawed concepts such as racial superiority.
We need to abandon and reject the oversimplified political rhetoric and sentiments which view whole segments of Malaysians as not only opponents but also as enemies.
In the 60s, Malaysia stood proudly in the forefront of a coalition of nations which boycotted and sanctioned South Africa for their implementation of apartheid. Yet today, by keeping alive race-based policies which were meant to only be temporary and limited, it can be argued that we are heading down a gradual slope towards apartheid.
Exploitation of the racial divide as a zero-sum game for often short-term economic and political gains has been allowed and tolerated for far too long.
It is one of the deepest fault lines in our democracy which threaten to undo all that we have worked on and strived to achieve.
Talking about what Malaysia will look like in 30 years would be pointless and a waste of time if we are unable to leave behind the harmful race-based policies of the past, and to insist on privilege and entitlements rather than merit and competition.
We need to be vocal about what version of Malaysia we want. The majority of right-thinking Malaysians who are moderate and see each other as partners in building this country need to lift their head up and not be silent.
We need to continue writing our thoughts to the media, to speak directly to our elected representatives, to participate in community dialogues, and to speak out and fight back against efforts to pit Malaysians against each other.
And most importantly, we must not lose hope in ourselves, in each other and the country. We can break the cycle of racism.
AZRUL MOHD KHALIB
Kuala Lumpur
http://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2017/02/13/we-need-to-break-cycle-of-racism/

Sunday, 5 February 2017

Cease the rhetoric on citizenship

A PROPOSAL that Malaysian children be required to learn the Malay language before they are given the “blue” identity cards for citizenship was recently reported. A university lecturer suggested ...

Friday, 27 January 2017
BY SYAHREDZAN JOHAN

A PROPOSAL that Malaysian children be required to learn the Malay language before they are given the “blue” identity cards for citizenship was recently reported. A university lecturer suggested that children who cannot speak Malay would only be given “red” identity cards until they are able to speak the language.

This proposal comes after a long stream of ethno-nationalist rhetoric on citizenship. Demands have been made before this for some to be stripped of their citizenship, purportedly for being “disloyal” or “traitorous”. Usually such calls are made as a direct response to dissent against the government of the day.
The act of questioning or calling for the revocation of citizenship is born out of the misconceived notion that certain Malaysians are citizens by virtue of their “birthright” as “natives” of the land, while others were “granted” citizenship by the grace of those with this “birthright”.
Provisions relating to citizenship are found in Part III of the Federal Constitution. There are essentially two broad types of Malaysian citizens.
The first type is those who are citizens “by operation of law”. They become citizens “automatically” when they are born, without the need to acquire citizenship through a formal process. An example would be those who are born within Malaysia who have at least one Malaysian parent, regardless of race or religion. Most Malaysians are citizens “by operation of law”.
The second group comprises those who acquire citizenship through a formal process, either registration or naturalisation. They are not born Malaysians. They are citizens of other countries before acquiring Malaysian citizenship.
Citizens of the first type cannot be stripped of their citizenship because of “disloyalty” or “treason”. They can only lose their citizenship if they voluntarily give it up, if they acquire the citizenship of another country or if they exercise a right in another country which is exclusive to citizens of that country.
It would thus be unconstitutional to impose conditions on these citizens, such as a requirement to speak the national language, in order for them to obtain an identity card. Such a move would violate their rights as citizens.
For the second type of citizens, they are indeed liable to have their citizenship revoked by the Federal Government if they are proven to be disloyal or for other circumstances.
It must be emphasised that race or ethnicity has nothing to do with the type of citizen you are.
From these constitutional provisions, it is clear that for the vast majority of Malaysians irrespective of race or religion, citizenship is guaranteed and protected by the Federal Constitution. The status of their citizenship should not be questioned.
Any attempt to invoke a misguided sense of racial “birthright” as a way to differentiate between different citizens ignores the constitutional reality; that for many, citizenship is a right, not a boon from the State.
The rhetoric on citizenship should stop. No one has a better “right” to citizenship compared to his or her fellow Malaysian. Regardless of how we historically came to define who is a citizen of this nation, we are all now citizens of this country.
Each of us have an equal stake and an equal say in the country. Each of us has a place under the Malaysian sun.
Syahredzan Johan is a partner of a legal firm in Kuala Lumpur with an interest in the laws that shape our country. He can be reached at syahredzan.johan@gmail.com. The views expressed here are entirely the writer’s own.

My View - Save Malaysia from corruption

"Corruption is corruption no matter who commits it," is indeed the take-home message for all in the fight to eliminate corruption.

ON reading Sultan Nazrin's address on corruption and how it can destroy a country, the message is direct and pointed.
"Corruption is corruption no matter who commits it," is indeed the take-home message for all in the fight to eliminate corruption.
But it is not just the "who", also the "what" and "how". No longer is it about the magnitude and material involved but goes beyond.
For example, "spiritual" corruption is often the "doorway" to such an activity. Included is knowledge corruption where the term "corruption" has been subtly redefined as new normal allowing it to be carried out under different disguises.
The message reminded me of an audience with the president of the Republic of Indonesia in 2006 in relation to a conference on disaster management following the 2004 tragic tsunami disaster that hit Aceh.
As part of the delegation of the Association of Southeast Institutions of Higher Learning (ASAIHL), we paid a courtesy visit to the then president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (more popularly known as SBY).
It was a memorable event not only because he is the first directly elected president, but he also exhibited frankness as a statesman in expressing his concern about the state of "corruption" in Indonesia.
He could have chosen to talk about how great Indonesia is as a nation of many legacies and traditions, but instead shared his experiences in dealing with the social menace that Indonesia is notoriously known for.
This, he reasoned, is because it has everything to do with education, and ASAIHL being the longest established association in the region has a crucial role to play in combating corruption.
Many sypmpathised with him when he related his embarrassment at global platforms having to meet his counterparts.
He felt that all eyes were focused on him as a leader of a nation crippled by corrupt practices, as though putting the blame on him for allowing the state of affairs to drag on for so long. And that he had condoned it for some selfish political reasons.
He shared how dreaded it was each time he had to face such predicaments and reiterated the importance of education in ensuring that future generations should be spared from such unpleasant events.
He also pledged to do the utmost in the support towards this end.
Hence today, Indonesia has seen some dramatic changes in the fight against corruption.
Only last month SBY, even as former president, continued to show unreserved concern, saying: "The Corruption Eradication Commission's (KPK) efforts to fight corruption must not weaken, slow down or even be restricted by any law or whatever form of interference by those in power."
"I must continue to encourage the efforts aimed at eradicating corruption. Just because I am no longer in power, my determination to this effect does not change, our fight will be fought through the Democratic Party factions in the DPR (the House of Representatives)," he said.
Although admittedly many ministers and party cadres were charged with corruption allegations during his administration, he is categorical that he never interfered in the internal affairs of the KPK, particularly when it came to prosecuting someone involved in corruption.
As president, allegedly he did not (mis)use the power to interfere in the commission's work.
"If I did it, it would tarnish the oath and the mandate given to me as a president who should set an example in eliminating corruption and making the KPK a success," he added.
Not surprising, the Indonesia Corruption Perception Index for 2015 showed an impressive improvement by 19 spots from 2014 to sit at 88th place among 168 countries.
In contrast, Malaysia though is placed higher at the 50th spot, its position has declined by four rungs since 2014 to the 54th place.
Between 2012 and 2013, its position has stagnated in the 49-55 range, so much so Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M) president Datuk Akhbar Satar warned that Indonesia "could soon outperform Malaysia in Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index" given its double-digit leaps up in the past few years.
Among the reasons why this is possible is KPK's independence as compared with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). Contrast the term "elimination" in KPK as compared with "anti" for MACC.
"In the past when KPK did not receive enough from the government's budget, the people raised funds and opened an office for KPK. Now KPK is financed by public donations and does not rely much on the budget," said TI-M.
This has enabled KPK to take on more high-profile cases as it is also vested with prosecutorial powers.
This has contributed to its 100% success rate on convictions.
It is therefore only befitting that in 2013, the KPK was the recipient of the Ramon Magsaysay Award, which is widely touted as the "Asian Nobel Prize", as the highest acknowledgement of Indonesia's seriousness in battling graft.
It is in this context that the Sultan of Perak's call to fight corruption without fear or favour must be heeded by all Malaysians and institutions.
This is a fight that we must not lose in order to save Malaysia from being destroyed.

With some four decades of experience in education locally and internationally, the writer believes that "another world is possible". Comments: letters@thesundaily.com
http://www.thesundaily.my/node/353867

Column - ‘Man of few words’ means business

"I'M a man of few words. I would like to warn those involved to stop immediately. This is not an empty threat."
This was the warning that rang out loud and clear from Datuk Dzulkilfi Ahmad shortly after he was appointed chief commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) in August last year
Posted on 2 February 2017 - 07:29pm
Last updated on 3 February 2017 - 08:04am



"I'M a man of few words. I would like to warn those involved to stop immediately. This is not an empty threat."
This was the warning that rang out loud and clear from Datuk Dzulkilfi Ahmad shortly after he was appointed chief commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) in August last year.
The warning which he issued in an interview with Bernama came with an "offer" to corrupt individuals – "surrender or wait for the MACC to come after you". He wants those involved in corrupt practices and abuse of power to step forward or be prepared to face the full brunt of the MACC's enforcement.
His primary focus is to enhance integrity in the public and private sectors.
And for the MACC to mean business, the warning will translate into raids of government and private offices if there is evidence of corrupt practice.
"We will study and discuss with the Attorney-General's Chambers on what action could be taken (for a lighter sentence) as the question of prosecution is under their purview," he said.
Before the warning could even sink in among those on the MACC radar screen, Dzulkifli walked the talk. In fact, Dzulkifli best epitomises the phrase "walk the talk" per se.
Hardly two days after the warning to crack down on corrupt civil servants, the MACC picked up high-ranking officials in a swoop in Kuala Lumpur, Malacca and Kelantan and seized RM13 million in cash and other assets.
Then came the truly sensational freezing of some RM200 million in the bank accounts of two top officials of the Sabah Water Department last October in what the media aptly described as the "Watergate" scandal after the US political scandal that forced the resignation of President Richard Nixon almost 45 years ago.
MACC officers who raided the house of one of the civil servants stumbled upon what could well be the biggest stash of ill-gotten cash ever discovered in history – well over RM50 million – that took officers more than 15 hours to count.
One of them was reported as saying that there was cash stacked in virtually every inch of the room, in cupboards, boxes and racks.
Jewellery and handbags worth millions were also found in the house and the Sabah Water Department director, who has since been replaced, and his wife are still in custody after failing to raise hefty bail amounts demanded by the prosecution team.
The MACC has been relentless in the crackdown with Dzulkifli coming out with another warning that from now on, there would be an average of one high-profile arrest each week.
Earlier last month, the secretary-general of a ministry was nabbed for alleged corrupt practice and abuse of power and had to be held in custody for about 10 days, along with two of his sons.
This particular case involving the topmost civil servant in a ministry sent shock waves across the civil service whose image has taken a beating.
I have been talking to some senior civil servants and the mood generally in the civil service is somewhat subdued in the face of this spate of arrests of people so senior and the question that comes to mind is "who's next?"
I could sense this mood earlier last month when I was invited to give a talk on media matters to top civil servants comprising secretaries-general and directors-general at their retreat in Pahang, just a few days after the arrest of the secretary-general.
Last week, the MACC detained four high-ranking officials of the Felda Land Development Authority (Felda), the government entity that controls one of the world's largest oil palm plantations.
To top it up, Dzulkifli, in a live interview with Awani TV, dropped another bombshell – "Tunggulah" (Just wait), he warned politicians as well, as the MACC is casting its net further afield in its war against corruption.
Many would have thought that it would take some time for this to happen. It did not.
On Tuesday, the MACC announced that it was investigating an allegation involving Mara chairman and former Cabinet minister Tan Sri Annuar Musa, who is also Umno information chief.
It is alleged that funds from Mara, a key government agency set up to uplift the economic status of Malays, were used to sponsor the Kelantan football team or better known as the Red Warriors.
Annuar is president of the Kelantan Football Association.
Mara, which comes under the Ministry of Rural And Regional Development, has suspended Annuar as chairman.
Amid the high-profile arrests, MACC itself faces some tough challenges internally in ensuring that those individuals brought to the courtroom are convicted.
There's nothing more frustrating to the MACC in general and its prosecutors in particular if those charged are acquitted due to weaknesses or gaps in the prosecution. Or worse still, acquitted on a technicality.
Dzulkifli, a lawyer of some standing, knows this more than anyone else. He was a top-notch officer of the Attorney-General's Chambers before being appointed the MACC chief commissioner.
At the AG's Chambers, he held posts like prosecution division forfeiture unit chief, Criminal Cases Management director and National Revenue Recovery Enforcement Team head.
He knows his stuff and we all wish him well as the unassuming "man of few words" gets cracking and lets his actions speak louder than words.
http://www.thesundaily.my/news/2149087

Malacca tightens entry requirements for foreign preachers

The Malaysian state of Malacca will review and tighten procedures for foreign preachers to prevent the spread of radical teaching. "We will review, revisit and tighten up all our procedures and ...

KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian state of Malacca will review and tighten procedures for foreign preachers to prevent the spread of radical teaching.
"We will review, revisit and tighten up all our procedures and guidelines for foreign preachers to give sermons here, to prevent radical teachings. Prevention is better than cure," Malacca's Chief Minister Idris Haron told Channel NewsAsia.
Mr Idris also questioned the need to have foreign preachers from war-torn countries coming to Malacca to teach people how to live in harmony.
"For example, we have Syrian preachers coming here to teach us how to live peacefully. Their country is in chaos ... and they want to teach us how to live peacefully? By right, our preachers should be going there to teach them how to live in peace and stability," said Mr Idris.
The six-year civil war in Syria has claimed more than 300,000 lives and displaced an estimated four million people from the country.
According to the minister, 157 foreign preachers held sermons and talks in Malacca from 2015 to 2016. Most of them were from Indonesia, while the others were from Pakistan, Thailand, India, Yemen, Iraq and Syria.
“We have in our state quite a number of good preachers who can preach well and are well-understood by the people. They are knowledgeable, experienced and well-recognised by certain quarters in society, but we still want external preachers," said Mr Idris.
“My worry is that they (foreign preachers) don’t respect the law of the state. For example, we have the requirement that there must be no insult against any of the different beliefs in our country where we have been living in unity, solidarity and harmony for the past 60 years."
“There is a possibility they (foreign preachers) could talk bad about other people’s beliefs and way of life,” Mr Idris added.
Last year, Malacca banned controversial Mumbai-based preacher Zakir Naik from preaching. The televangelist with millions of followers is banned in the UK and Canada for openly expressing support for Al-Qaeda.
MALAYSIANS WHO WERE RADICALISED BY FOREIGNERS
Malaysia has a recent history of foreign preachers radicalising its citizens.
The most prominent case was that of Malaysian mathematician Azahari Husin, the bomb-maker of the 2002 Bali bombings that killed more than 200 people.
The moderate Azahari became a radical when he fell under the influence of Indonesian preacher, Abu Bakar Bashir, the spiritual leader of the regional militant network Jemaah Islamiyah which is blamed for the Bali bombings. Bashir had lived in exile in Malaysia from 1985 to 1999.
Azahari inflicted carnage on Indonesia from 2002 to 2005. Apart from the Bali bombings, he also assembled explosive devices for the 2003 Jakarta Marriott Hotel car bombing and the 2004 Australian Embassy blast. He was killed in a shootout with Indonesian police in 2005 in Batu, Malang, East Java.
In 2010, Malaysia deported Syrian preacher Aiman al-Dakak, an alleged senior leader of Al-Qaeda who recruited university students. He was also said to have plotted to attack Batu Caves in Kuala Lumpur, a popular tourist attraction housing Hindu temples.

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/malacca-tightens-entry-requirements-for-foreign-preachers/3486332.html


- - - - - - - - - 

Thursday, 2 February 2017

You’re not allowed to give talks in Malacca, foreign preachers told

image: http://www.thestar.com.my/~/media/online/2015/10/08/01/24/idrisharon.ashx/?w=620&h=413&crop=1&hash=C2DC712B0CE854B47C979961A8ED70300FBA3185
Chief Minister Datuk Seri Idris Haron
Chief Minister Datuk Seri Idris Haron
 
MALACCA: Foreign Islamic prea­chers will no longer be allowed to give talks on Islam in Malacca, says Chief Minister Datuk Seri Idris Haron.
He said the state Islamic affairs department had been directed to screen religious speakers and turn away requests from foreign preachers to give talks in the state from now on.
Idris said Malaysian preachers were more than able to handle talks on Islam here, adding that they understood the religious sensitivities and different cultures of the country.
“Foreign preachers don’t comprehend our culture and sensitivities. It can be possible that their sermons may incite hatred or jeopardise the harmonious relations between the different races of Malaysia,” he told a press conference yesterday.

Idris revealed that 157 foreign preachers held sermons and talks in Malacca from 2015 to last year.
Most of them were from Indonesia, while the others were from Pakistan, Thailand, India, Yemen, Iraq and Syria.
“I’m also afraid the talks could lead to radicalism, distrust and abhorrence of other faiths.
“Some of these (foreign) preachers were egoistic and not willing to compromise on our values of preserving Malaysia’s rich diversity of cultures and religions.
“Islam teaches us to care for others, but some of these foreign preachers have their own views.”
In April last year, controversial speaker Dr Zakir Naik was barred from giving a talk titled “Similarities Between Hinduism and Islam” in Malacca.
http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2017/02/02/youre-not-allowed-to-give-talks-in-malacca-foreign-preachers-told/

Zakir Naik and the cheapening of Islam

There is a video of Zakir Naik smugly telling the host of a chat show that non-Muslims are not allowed to preach in an Islamic state. Why?  Well, we Muslims already have the truth so why should we allow others to preach falsehoods ...
Friday April 22, 2016
7:24 AM GMT+8
Farouk A Peru

APRIL 22 ― There is a video of Zakir Naik smugly telling the host of a chat show that non-Muslims are not allowed to preach in an Islamic state. Why?
Well, we Muslims already have the truth so why should we allow others to preach falsehoods in our lands? Never mind the fact that Muslims are freely living, worshipping and preaching in the West.
Zakir’s supporters won’t think about that. That is how their minds work. A privileged, supremacist outlook which can only be termed as the chosen people syndrome.
And if you are offended by Zakir, he adds, you can just “sue the Quran.” Despite the fact his style goes completely against the Quran, he feels he is God’s elect.
Zakir Naik fits perfectly into this mindset. He thrives in an environment where both the organizers and audience are firmly on his side.
His work is no different than that of the American televangelical preachers who thrive on bringing in fake ex-Muslims like Ergun Caner (look him up on YouTube, he has been exposed for his fake history spun to win points with the Islamophobic crowd. In reality Caner cannot even pronounce the Sunni shahada correctly!).
Like that, Naik’s followers have little concern for the truth. To them, it is the show which matters and their faiths get cheapened in the process.
During Zakir Naik’s concert (and I use the word intentionally), there were apparently four conversions. I say “apparently” because Naik’s colleague, Yusuf Estes, was exposed for faking converts in Germany using the “recycled converts manoeuvre.”
Estes gave some flatulent excuses but let's face it, his audience loved the notion of a thousand converts in one show. That is what it’s really about in this cheapened version of Islam ― the numbers. Always the numbers.
Has anyone thought of the consequences of Zakir Naik’s show? Let's take the most celebrated conversion of that evening ― that of Woo Nina Grace, aged 19.
Ms Woo, who is of Filipino and Chinese parentage, has been reportedly studying Islam since the age of 13. I salute her, not because she chose to convert to Islam particularly, but because she has such a clear resolution at such an early age.
Here’s the question though: did she need a public conversion at the hands of this Islamofascist to ratify her faith?
Of course not.
The organisers and perhaps Zakir himself used her for popularity reasons. She did not need a public conversion at all.
News reports that followed indicated that her father at least was disapproving of her conversion. This is what Islamofascists fail to realise ― that other people cherish their respective faiths as much as Muslims cherish ours.
Ms Woo’s father may have raised her with all the love of a parent who sees great joy in passing along his faith to his beloved daughter. His daughter then spurns his gift and joins the other side! Islam unequivocally rejects the divinity of Jesus, something very blasphemous to Christians.
Am I advocating Ms Woo should not have converted? Absolutely not! She has a right to her faith and it is, after all, her life. However, she did not need the cheap publicity of Zakir Naik’s concert to do it!
Likely her conversion caused great humiliation to her father. The public spectacle was simply unnecessary. Was Zakir Naik paid for these concerts? If he was, then this money is tainted. He would have used religion for his personal gain.
According to a now viral report in Malaysiakini, Zakir did allow the audience to throw him some difficult questions. Ramesh Rajaratnam did praise Zakir for his vast knowledge (I disagree. I find Zakir crass and shallow at best. What he does can be done by a well-trained parrot!).
However, Ramesh also pointed out that Zakir was incredibly arrogant, denigrating people’s language and level of knowledge. I wonder if Zakir was following the Sunnah of the Prophet just then?
Ramesh himself levelled some questions at Zakir. One question connected the polygamous practice of the Prophet (pbuh) to the permission supposedly given to him by the Quran.
Ramesh pointed out that this was too convenient and in fact, Aisha (the youngest wife of the Prophet) actually made such a suggestion herself!
Zakir’s response was the usual spiel about political marriages and a circular logical statement that “God says so.” This is the shallow level of retort Zakir is capable of.
There is no real depth to him and he is really an embarrassment to Quranic apologetics. In another video, he actually makes a comparison between the metaphysical notion of the afterlife with the axiomatic truth of mathematics. This shows his inability to understand the various types of truth as well.
Little wonder then that the loudest supporters of Zakir are none other than Isma, the confused Islamofascists. Malay Mail Online columnist Shafiqah Othman Hamzah was lambasted by a Wanita Isma representative, an actual professor madya, for criticising Malay-Muslim support for Zakir!
The professor displayed why Malaysian tertiary education is in the slumps when she said the Quran does not support apostasy when in fact it gives total and unconditional freedom of religion.
Zakir himself advocates murdering people who leave Islam and preaches to other Muslims yet he does not mind if Muslim converts preach to others!
Such is his confidence in the Muslims’ faith. Someone should have asked Zakir if he supported Malay privileges. He would have spun faster than our washing machines to get out of that one!
Zakir Naik’s parting remark is to advocate an Umno and PAS coalition government. I suggest to his opponents for his next concert, ask him if he supports racism and racial privileges. Show him Umno’s track record of corruption and ask him if such a party can be Islamic.
Very sadly, Zakir Naik’s concerts were like the Back Street Boys' revival shows, all packed out. Forty thousand people attended his last show.
This is simply an indication of what Islam is for many of us ― nothing but a cheap thrill. It’s all about the numbers and the humiliation of other religions. Muslims need to rise above this cesspool and become compassionate human beings.
*This is the personal opinion of the columnist.
http://www.themalaymailonline.com/opinion/farouk-a.-peru/article/zakir-naik-and-the-cheapening-of-islam

On-the-run Zakir Naik to give Friday sermon in Perlis

Fugitive televangelist Dr Zakir Naik will be delivering a Friday sermon in Perlis on February 10, according to a poster shared by the state’s mufti Datuk Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin yesterday.

29 January 2017

File photo of Muslim preacher Dr Zakir Naik at a talk titled ‘The Importance of Unity Among the Muslim Ummah’ at the Gong Badak stadium, in Kuala Nerus April 10, 2016. — Bernama picFile photo of Muslim preacher Dr Zakir Naik at a talk titled ‘The Importance of Unity Among the Muslim Ummah’ at the Gong Badak stadium, in Kuala Nerus April 10, 2016. — Bernama picKUALA LUMPUR, Jan 29 — Fugitive televangelist Dr Zakir Naik will be delivering a Friday sermon in Perlis on February 10, according to a poster shared by the state’s mufti Datuk Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin yesterday.
The poster indicated that the sermon is jointly organised by the Perlis Islamic Religious Affairs Department, the Islamic and Perlis Islamic Affairs and Malay Customs Council, and the office of the Perlis mufti.
The sermon will be delivered at the state mosque in Arau.
In the poster, Dr Zakir is described as a “researcher and caller to Islam”.
Last month, Dr Zakir visited a private Islamic-centric university in Shah Alam, Selangor, which is also under investigation for radical teachings after two students were arrested on suspicion of being Islamic State recruits planning a terror attack locally.
Although a fugitive in India, Deputy Home Minister Datuk Nur Jazlan Mohamed said the controversial Islamic preacher is free to travel in Malaysia because he is not on the terror list here.
He has been reported by several Indian newspapers to be on the run to avoid prosecution in India.
The Salafist preacher has also been banned from several countries like Bangladesh, Canada and the UK.
In November last year, Times of India reported the Indian government has imposed a five-year ban on Dr Zakir’s NGO, the Islamic Research Foundation.
The daily reported that India’s authorities are also mulling terror charges against Dr Zakir, reportedly based on testimonies of about 50 terror suspects and convicts recorded from various jails, with those caught citing the medical doctor as their motivation and source of inspiration.