Showing posts with label Malay Mail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Malay Mail. Show all posts

Monday, 16 April 2018

Rafidah quits Supermax board over MD’s apology

Former minister Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz has resigned as chairman and director of Supermax Corp Bhd, saying she disagreed with convicted managing director Datuk Seri Stanley Thai’s apology for supporting Malaysia’s Opposition in 2013.

Monday April 16, 2018

Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz was appointed chairman of Supermax, the world’s second-largest glove manufacturer, in 2015. — Picture by K.E. Ooi
Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz was appointed chairman of Supermax, the world’s second-largest
glove manufacturer, in 2015. — Picture by K.E. Ooi
KUALA LUMPUR, April 16 — Former minister Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz has resigned as chairman and director of Supermax Corp Bhd, saying she disagreed with convicted managing director Datuk Seri Stanley Thai’s apology for supporting Malaysia’s Opposition in 2013.
According to news portal Malaysiakini, Rafidah said it was the right of all Malaysians and companies to support whichever political party they choose.
“Pursuant to the ‘apology’ by Stanley Thai to the (incumbent) prime minister for whatever he did during the 13th general election, I have resigned from serving as a director of Supermax Corporation and as the chairperson, with effect from April 14.
“While it is his (Thai’s) right to do what he feels he needed to do, I do not share the same sentiments,” she was quoted saying.
The former international trade and industry minister said she was a strong proponent of integrity and honesty as well as a believer in the individual’s prerogative to back the political party of his choice without fear of repercussions.
Rafidah was appointed chairman of Supermax, the world’s second-largest glove manufacturer, in 2015.
Thai, who was convicted of insider trading in 2014 and is currently appealing against his five-year sentence, called a press conference last Saturday where he formally apologised to Datuk Seri Najib Razak.
He expressed regret for allowing himself to be influenced by the local Opposition in 2013, and said he has since formed the belief that businesspeople “should not be involved in politics under any circumstances”.
In a 2013 interview with Bloomberg, Thai said he was joining the local Chinese community in withdrawing its support from the ruling Barisan Nasional “to protect the future of his children”.
http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/rafidah-quits-supermax-board-over-mds-apology

Wednesday, 27 September 2017

Johor not a Taliban state, Sultan tells Muslim-only laundry

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 27 — Johor’s Sultan Ibrahim Sultan Iskandar has ordered a Muslim-only laundry to stop the discriminatory practice, saying it was embarrassing and against his inclusive vision of a Bangsa Johor.
Wednesday September 27, 2017
Pictures of the launderette in Muar displaying a sign that it only allowed Muslim customers at the premise has been widely shared on the social media since last week. — Picture via Facebook/Kelab Info Malaysia
Pictures of the launderette in Muar displaying a sign that it only allowed Muslim customers
at the premise has been widely shared on the social media since last week. — Picture via Facebook/Kelab
Sultan Ibrahim said such “nonsense” was unacceptable, and told the laundry operator that he must either comply or risk enforced closure, according to an interview published by The Star today.
“This is not a Taliban state and as the Head of Islam in Johor, I find this action to be totally unacceptable as this is extremist in nature,” he was quoted as saying.
“I want the owner to apologise to me and the people of Johor. He has made Johoreans very angry and embarrassed because this is not the Johor we want.
He was also reported as saying that he ordered state Islamic Religious Affairs committee chairman Abdul Mutalip Abd Rahim, the religious council and district council to investigate the matter.
Pictures of the launderette in Muar displaying a sign that it only allowed Muslim customers at the premise has been widely shared on the social media since last week.
After learning of this, Sultan Ibrahim said he was “deeply appalled” by the owner’s action.
The laundry changed this to “Muslim-friendly” following backlash, but the Johor Sultan saw through the ploy and said it was essentially the same thing.
Calling Johor a state that treats all races fairly, Sultan Ibrahim noted that even mosques were open to non-Muslims who are properly dressed.
“I wonder where this launderette owner washes his clothes when he is overseas? Is he saying only the clothes of Muslims are clean and those of non-Muslims are unclean? That’s what he means, I believe.
“From now on, I am directing the state executive council and all the councils to insist that any business owners who carry out such blatant discriminatory practices should have their licences revoked.
“Don’t mess around with your narrow-minded religious prejudices,” he was quoted as saying.
Sultan Ibrahim reportedly said that if he kept quiet about this incident, it could open up to more extremist practices such as “taxis for only Muslims or non-Muslims”.
In a separate report, the owner said he only initiated such a business practice because he wanted to show that he was a good Muslim.
“For Muslims, it is not just about clean clothes but cleanliness as a whole. I am just providing an avenue for Muslims to do that,” said the 40-year-old owner who declined to be named.
The owner said that he hoped non-Muslims would understand his point of view on the basis of his religion.
He pointed that non-Muslims could visit other nearby self-service launderettes, adding that one was just 300 metres away from his outlet.

http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/johor-not-a-taliban-state-sultan-tells-muslim-only-laundry




Royal dressing down for Muslim-only launderette



PETALING JAYA: The controversial Muslim-only launderette in Muar has been ordered to stop its discriminatory practice or face shut down by the Sultan of Johor, Sultan Ibrahim Ibni Almarhum Sultan Iskandar.
The Star newspaper today reported the Sultan as saying he was "deeply appalled" by the action of the launderette owner as it would lead to more narrow-minded actions in the name of Islam.
"I cannot accept this nonsense. This is Johor, which belongs to Bangsa Johor and it belongs to all races and faiths. This is a progressive, modern and moderate state.
"This is not a Taliban state and as the Head of Islam in Johor, I find this action to be totally unacceptable as this is extremist in nature," the newspaper quoted His Majesty as saying in its exclusive report.
The owner had put up a sign to say the launderette is "Muslim-friendly" after an uproar over its "Muslim-only" signage.
"Don't try to be clever. It's still the same. The owner needs to have his brains cleaned up," the Sultan said.
"I want to put a stop to such extremism. Extremism has no place in my state. We take pride in being Bangsa Johor and I want to know where the owner of this launderette learned his Islam? Islam teaches the faithful to be tolerant and respect other people and faiths."

http://www.thesundaily.my/news/2017/09/27/royal-dressing-down-muslim-only-launderette

Also:

Thank You, Tuanku   
http://www.pressreader.com/malaysia/the-sun-malaysia/20170928/281479276608331

Johor laundromat reverses 'Muslims-only' policy after royal rebuke   https://www.pressreader.com/singapore/today/20170928/281500751445339

Thursday, 1 June 2017

What those diesel fumes are REALLY doing to your health

What those diesel fumes are REALLY doing to your health: Heart attacks, strokes and 40,000 deaths a year are blamed on rising air pollution levels


  • Air pollution kills more in the UK than in most Western European countries
  • Serious conditions, from stroke to cancer, are increasingly linked to air pollution
  • About a third of the country's air pollution is from transport


Taking a breath of ‘fresh air’ may not be quite as healthy as you thought. Air pollution has become a major health problem in Britain, claiming more lives here than in most Western European countries, an alarming UN report revealed last week.

This followed research published last year that blamed air pollution for at least 40,000 deaths a year in the UK.

It is well known that pollution can aggravate and possibly trigger health conditions such as asthma.

‘Over short periods, high pollution levels can cause damage to the lining of our lungs,’ explains Stephen Spiro, honorary professor of respiratory medicine at University College Hospital, London. ‘This can lead to coughing, wheeziness and breathlessness, particularly among people with a pre-existing lung condition.’

But other conditions, from stroke to cancer, are increasingly being linked to air pollution.
One of the major culprits is traffic fumes — about a third of our air pollution is from transport, explains Alastair Lewis, a professor of atmospheric chemistry at the University of York.

This pollution consists largely of nitrogen dioxide — most of which comes from diesel engines — and fine particles known as particulates, released from exhausts and by the wearing down of brakes and tyres.

Official figures show that 37 out of 43 areas across the UK breach legal European Union limits for nitrogen dioxide, which is linked mainly to breathing problems.

‘Almost every combustion process — such as functioning power stations — produces particulates,’ adds Professor Lewis.

‘The difference with cars is that unlike power stations, they are everywhere and close to where most people live. So the pollution they cause is disproportionately more important for public health.’

Polluting particles of soot, carbon and from aerosols are categorised by size and typically divided into two groups: coarse particles less than ten micrometres wide, known as PM10, and fine particles less than 2.5 micrometres wide (PM2.5).

Last week diesel vehicles were described as one of the ‘worst offenders’ for PM2.5 by researchers who found that even PM2.5 levels well within the EU maximum can cause inflammation in the body and raise blood pressure.

Last week diesel vehicles were described as one of the ‘worst offenders’ for PM2.5
Last week diesel vehicles were described as one of the ‘worst offenders’ for PM2.5

In a study funded by the British Heart Foundation (BHF) and the Wellcome Trust, the researchers found that the greater the exposure to this size of particulate, ‘the larger the heart becomes and the worse it performs’, raising the risk of death from heart disease.

‘This adds to the growing evidence that air pollution, particularly from small particles in diesel fumes, is dangerous for your heart and health,’ said Professor Jeremy Pearson, the BHF’s associate medical director.

And the smaller the particulate, the more harmful, it seems.

‘Ultra-fine particles even smaller than PM2.5 can penetrate the skin and enter the lungs much more easily,’ says Prashant Kumar, a professor in air quality and health at the University of Surrey.

This month researchers at Imperial College London revealed that tiny diesel particles just 0.1 micrometres in diameter can directly affect the lungs and cause tighter airways and coughing.

Here, with the help of leading experts, we reveal the latest evidence on what traffic pollution could be doing to your health . . .

How they can hurt your heart

Almost one stroke in three is triggered by air pollution, according to a worldwide study by Auckland University of Technology, in New Zealand.

The research, published last year, found air pollution was among the top ten causes of stroke, along with better-known risks such as smoking.

One theory is that over the long term, air pollution makes blood thicker and this in turn raises blood pressure, so boosting the risk of clots in the brain.

But even short-term exposure to air pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide and particulates increased the risk of hospital admission or death from stroke in the following seven days, according to a review of studies involving six million people published in 2015 by Edinburgh University.

There is a strong link between pollution and heart problems
There is a strong link between pollution and heart problems

‘The evidence suggesting air pollution as a risk factor for stroke is very strong,’ says Pippa Tyrrell, a professor of stroke medicine at the University of Manchester. ‘It’s vital this issue is addressed by the Government. But in the meantime it is even more important to avoid other stroke risk factors and take more exercise.’

There is also a strong link between pollution and heart problems, says Professor David Newby, BHF John Wheatley Chair of Cardiology at Edinburgh University — as an acute trigger causing a heart attack, for example, or associated with long-term heart disease.
‘The mechanism isn’t exactly clear but these tiny particles may get deep into the lungs, then into the bloodstream,’ says Professor Newby. ‘This affects the blood cells, causing blood to become stickier and more likely to clot.’

He adds that compounds on the surface of particles of pollution are associated with processes that could lead to the build-up of fatty material inside the arteries.

Bad news for your sleep 

Air pollution could be to blame for bad sleep, too. A study presented to the American Thoracic Society conference this month measured how long participants spent asleep and found their quality of sleep was affected by air pollution: the more exposure someone had to nitrogen dioxide and PM2.5, the worse their chances of a good night’s sleep.

‘Your nose, sinuses and the back of your throat can all be irritated by those pollutants, so that can cause some sleep disruption,’ says Martha Billings, a professor at the University of Washington, who led the research.

Study volunteers with raised nitrogen dioxide in their bodies were up to 60 per cent more likely to suffer from sleep deprivation than those living in areas with lower pollution levels.

A study found the more exposure someone has to nitrogen dioxide and PM2.5, the worse their chances of a good night’s sleep
A study found the more exposure someone has to nitrogen dioxide and PM2.5, the worse their chances of a good night’s sleep

They can make your eyes acidic 

High levels of air pollution can raise the risk of dry eye syndrome as well as allergic conjunctivitis — inflammation of the eye.

‘Particulates from diesel emissions can act as an irritant to the surface of the eye, causing dryness and irritation,’ says Marsel Bregu, a consultant ophthalmologist at Warrington Hospital and the Spire Cheshire.

Contact lenses may make matters worse, as particulates can lodge between the contact lens and the surface of the eye.

‘We have been seeing more cases of dry eyes in the past few years, as well as the inflammatory condition red eye. There must be a correlation between this and air pollution,’ says Mr Bregu.

There is a direct correlation between pollution levels and various eye infections, according to a study by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in 2002.

The researchers also suggested that high levels of air pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide make the tear film of the eyes more acidic.

‘This could cause a burning, stinging discomfort to the eyes,’ says Dr Jeff Kwartz, a consultant ophthalmologist at the Royal Bolton Hospital.

There is a direct correlation between pollution levels and various eye infections
There is a direct correlation between pollution levels and various eye infections

A worrying link to cancer

Pollution has contributed to a 10 per cent rise in cancer diagnoses, according to a study by the University of Illinois, published this month — equivalent to more than 28,600 cancer diagnoses in Britain.

While someone’s chance of developing the disease may be partly down to genetics, the report’s authors say it could also be that pollution damages DNA and the way hormones function, leading to cancer.

Air pollution caused by traffic and industry may increase the risk of lung cancer independently of factors such as smoking and age, according to research by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

Analysing data from more than 16,000 men between 1971 and 1998, the researchers estimated that the risk of developing lung cancer was 8 per cent higher for men living where levels of nitrogen dioxide, mainly produced by traffic, were higher.

It could be that inhaled pollutants damage DNA in the lung cells. Or soot particles may get lodged deep in the lungs, causing long-term inflammation. This could increase the rate at which cells divide and the chance of random mutations growing and spreading.

Why they can trigger eczema and age spots

Air pollution is a particular issue for those with eczema. This condition occurs when the skin barrier — the outermost protective layer of skin — does not work, explains Daniel Glass, a consultant dermatologist at the Harley Street Dermatology Clinic.

‘So those who are genetically predisposed to eczema may find it is triggered by air pollution.’

He adds that as eczema is associated with the subsequent development of asthma, pollution increases the likelihood of both.

Air pollution is a particular issue for those who suffer from eczema
Air pollution is a particular issue for those who suffer from eczema

Pollution also damages skin cells, speeding up breakdown of the collagen that keeps our skin supple and eventually leading to problems with pigmentation and wrinkles.

Particulates have been linked to signs of ageing in the skin, especially pigment spots and more pronounced nasolabial folds (the lines that run from each side of the nose to the corners of the mouth), according to a 2010 study published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

The researchers looked at the skin of 400 women living either in rural areas or near busy roads in Germany and marked out signs of ageing such as pigmentation and wrinkles. Almost all had remained at the same address for the previous 30 years.

The study concluded that pollution may have caused skin ageing by triggering oxidative stress.

‘The study suggests that because of exposure to pollution, the skin is hindered from repairing itself, leading to signs of ageing,’ says Andrew Wright, a professor of dermatology at the University of Bradford.

Risk of problems in pregnancy

Expectant mothers living close to busy roads are at greater risk of serious complications because of their exposure to air pollution, research suggests.

This year, a study led by the University of Copenhagen of 73,000 women found that pre-eclampsia — a form of high blood pressure that affects 42,000 pregnant women in Britain each year — is made more likely by noise and pollution from roads.

Researchers believe the toxins may raise stress levels and cause inflammation leading to rising blood pressure. In severe cases, pre-eclampsia can lead to stillbirth or be fatal to the mother.

‘There is robust evidence to link low birth weight with exposure to pollution such as diesel,’ says Jonathan Grigg, a professor of paediatric respiratory and environmental medicine at Queen Mary University of London.

Research suggests expectant mothers living close to busy roads are at greater risk of serious complications because of their exposure to air pollution
Research suggests expectant mothers living close to busy roads are at greater risk of serious complications because of their exposure to air pollution

‘The theory is that the particles of pollution may produce inflammation in the mother’s lungs which then triggers mediators — substances released from cells — that leach into the blood and affect development of the child.’

This year, researchers from the Stockholm Environment Institute also found that particulates under 2.5 micrometres could be to blame for millions of premature births globally each year.

Could they cause diabetes?...

Researchers in Munich found that children living in polluted areas were more likely to develop insulin resistance — a precursor to type 2 diabetes — by the age of ten. They suggest the link is due to inflammation in the body caused by cells reacting to air pollution particles.

Meanwhile, a 2012 study of 4,000 women living in Los Angeles by Boston University found that those living in polluted areas were more likely to have high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes.

Jim Zhang, professor of global and environmental health at Duke University in the U.S, who has researched links between diabetes and pollution, told Good Health: ‘The evidence is mounting to support the link between air pollution and risk factors for diabetes.’

... And make bones CRUMBLE faster

Air pollution has been shown to accelerate the development of osteoporosis, according to Amit Amin, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon at St George’s Hospital in South West London.

‘Advanced age, menopause, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption and a sedentary lifestyle are the most common risk factors but pollution is likely to contribute to the breakdown of bone cells, raising the chance of developing osteoporosis,’ he says

Will wearing a face mask protect you?

The easiest way to avoid pollution is to keep away from busy roads, says Alastair Lewis, a professor of atmospheric chemistry at the University of York. 

But what else may help protect you? We asked the experts.

Respro City mask
£29.99, respro.com

This moulded mask blocks airborne particles (or particulates) as small as 10 micrometres (PM10), such as those linked with vehicle exhaust emissions.

EXPERT VERDICT: ‘Good masks can stop us inhaling pollutants,’ says Roy Harrison, a professor of environmental health at the University of Birmingham. ‘This mask will filter out many harmful particles, such as diesel particles, efficiently.

‘However, it wouldn’t block all harmful gases in vehicle emissions such as nitrogen dioxide, as these can pass through the weave. The only way to keep them out is through an activated carbon filter, similar to those in World War II gas masks.

‘A mask must not leak air from the sides, which can occur if you have a beard. This mask is a good tight fit.’

8/10

Clarins UV+ Anti-Pollution Cream
30ml, £32, Boots

This contains cantaloupe melon extract, which has antioxidant properties; blackcurrant extract to limit inflammation; and an anti-pollution complex with white tea and succory to neutralise free radicals.

EXPERT VERDICT: ‘Pollution can damage the skin barrier, leaving it vulnerable to inflammation and irritation,’ says Justine Hextall, a consultant dermatologist at Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. ‘Damaged cells release free radicals that raise levels of the enzyme MMP-1, which breaks down collagen and elastin, our skin’s scaffolding.

‘While there may be some, albeit limited, evidence for blackcurrant and white tea to protect cells from free radical damage, this is a topical application and it is unclear how much you would absorb.’

4/10

Health Plus Detox Pack supplement
28 sachets, £15.45, healthplus.co.uk

This ‘advanced anti-pollutant formula’, with antioxidants such as glutathione, helps remove ‘toxins and heavy metals’ from the body.

EXPERT VERDICT: ‘The theory is that “oxidant” molecules and free radicals released in the body as a result of pollution are associated with inflammation and a range of diseases,’ says Professor Harrison. ‘In response, your body produces antioxidants — and this product helps to supplement these. But I know of no trials showing that antioxidants in supplement form help protect you from diseases or pollution.’

Glutathione is a strong antioxidant ‘but it’s broken down in the digestive tract and may not get to the cells, where it is needed,’ adds Dr Hextall.

3/10

Dyson Pure Cool Link Tower filter
£449.99, John Lewis

Air is drawn into a filter that traps particles as small as 0.1 micrometre (PM 0.1). It has pollution sensors to monitor and adjust the airflow.

EXPERT VERDICT: ‘The use of a HEPA (high efficiency particulate air) filter means it will catch a range of particles and sizes,’ says Professor Harrison. ‘The filter may need replacing after a time. Gases such as nitrogen dioxide — released when diesel is burnt — are so small, they may pass through the filter.’

9/10

London Air app
Free for iPhone and Android, see londonair.org.uk

This displays the latest air pollution levels in your area of London.
EXPERT VERDICT: ‘The information is reliable,’ says Professor Harrison, ‘and there is explicit health advice for people with illnesses such as asthma.’

Some local authorities around the country are developing similar apps, but you can also access this information at uk-air.defra.gov.uk.

9/10

Awair device
£179.99, getawair.co.uk

This tracks volatile organic compounds (chemicals released by cleaning products, burning fuel and cooking), dust and carbon dioxide. It sends this data via an app to your smartphone.

EXPERT VERDICT: ‘This claims to measure five key factors of air quality but how it can sense all the known pollutants at once I don’t know,’ says Professor Harrison. ‘To do this reliably I would expect it to be much more expensive.’
4/10


REN Flash Defence Anti-Pollution Mist
60ml, £24, escentual.com

A mist that forms a barrier against ‘free radicals and pollution’, with quercetin.

EXPERT VERDICT: ‘How can this claim to shield the skin from external free radicals when free radicals, by definition, come from within the skin?’ says Dr Hextall. ‘Whether quercetin has any antioxidant effect in spray form is unknown.’

2/10 
Jinan Harb

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4553248/What-diesel-fumes-REALLY-doing-health.html

Sunday, 5 February 2017

Zakir Naik and the cheapening of Islam

There is a video of Zakir Naik smugly telling the host of a chat show that non-Muslims are not allowed to preach in an Islamic state. Why?  Well, we Muslims already have the truth so why should we allow others to preach falsehoods ...
Friday April 22, 2016
7:24 AM GMT+8
Farouk A Peru

APRIL 22 ― There is a video of Zakir Naik smugly telling the host of a chat show that non-Muslims are not allowed to preach in an Islamic state. Why?
Well, we Muslims already have the truth so why should we allow others to preach falsehoods in our lands? Never mind the fact that Muslims are freely living, worshipping and preaching in the West.
Zakir’s supporters won’t think about that. That is how their minds work. A privileged, supremacist outlook which can only be termed as the chosen people syndrome.
And if you are offended by Zakir, he adds, you can just “sue the Quran.” Despite the fact his style goes completely against the Quran, he feels he is God’s elect.
Zakir Naik fits perfectly into this mindset. He thrives in an environment where both the organizers and audience are firmly on his side.
His work is no different than that of the American televangelical preachers who thrive on bringing in fake ex-Muslims like Ergun Caner (look him up on YouTube, he has been exposed for his fake history spun to win points with the Islamophobic crowd. In reality Caner cannot even pronounce the Sunni shahada correctly!).
Like that, Naik’s followers have little concern for the truth. To them, it is the show which matters and their faiths get cheapened in the process.
During Zakir Naik’s concert (and I use the word intentionally), there were apparently four conversions. I say “apparently” because Naik’s colleague, Yusuf Estes, was exposed for faking converts in Germany using the “recycled converts manoeuvre.”
Estes gave some flatulent excuses but let's face it, his audience loved the notion of a thousand converts in one show. That is what it’s really about in this cheapened version of Islam ― the numbers. Always the numbers.
Has anyone thought of the consequences of Zakir Naik’s show? Let's take the most celebrated conversion of that evening ― that of Woo Nina Grace, aged 19.
Ms Woo, who is of Filipino and Chinese parentage, has been reportedly studying Islam since the age of 13. I salute her, not because she chose to convert to Islam particularly, but because she has such a clear resolution at such an early age.
Here’s the question though: did she need a public conversion at the hands of this Islamofascist to ratify her faith?
Of course not.
The organisers and perhaps Zakir himself used her for popularity reasons. She did not need a public conversion at all.
News reports that followed indicated that her father at least was disapproving of her conversion. This is what Islamofascists fail to realise ― that other people cherish their respective faiths as much as Muslims cherish ours.
Ms Woo’s father may have raised her with all the love of a parent who sees great joy in passing along his faith to his beloved daughter. His daughter then spurns his gift and joins the other side! Islam unequivocally rejects the divinity of Jesus, something very blasphemous to Christians.
Am I advocating Ms Woo should not have converted? Absolutely not! She has a right to her faith and it is, after all, her life. However, she did not need the cheap publicity of Zakir Naik’s concert to do it!
Likely her conversion caused great humiliation to her father. The public spectacle was simply unnecessary. Was Zakir Naik paid for these concerts? If he was, then this money is tainted. He would have used religion for his personal gain.
According to a now viral report in Malaysiakini, Zakir did allow the audience to throw him some difficult questions. Ramesh Rajaratnam did praise Zakir for his vast knowledge (I disagree. I find Zakir crass and shallow at best. What he does can be done by a well-trained parrot!).
However, Ramesh also pointed out that Zakir was incredibly arrogant, denigrating people’s language and level of knowledge. I wonder if Zakir was following the Sunnah of the Prophet just then?
Ramesh himself levelled some questions at Zakir. One question connected the polygamous practice of the Prophet (pbuh) to the permission supposedly given to him by the Quran.
Ramesh pointed out that this was too convenient and in fact, Aisha (the youngest wife of the Prophet) actually made such a suggestion herself!
Zakir’s response was the usual spiel about political marriages and a circular logical statement that “God says so.” This is the shallow level of retort Zakir is capable of.
There is no real depth to him and he is really an embarrassment to Quranic apologetics. In another video, he actually makes a comparison between the metaphysical notion of the afterlife with the axiomatic truth of mathematics. This shows his inability to understand the various types of truth as well.
Little wonder then that the loudest supporters of Zakir are none other than Isma, the confused Islamofascists. Malay Mail Online columnist Shafiqah Othman Hamzah was lambasted by a Wanita Isma representative, an actual professor madya, for criticising Malay-Muslim support for Zakir!
The professor displayed why Malaysian tertiary education is in the slumps when she said the Quran does not support apostasy when in fact it gives total and unconditional freedom of religion.
Zakir himself advocates murdering people who leave Islam and preaches to other Muslims yet he does not mind if Muslim converts preach to others!
Such is his confidence in the Muslims’ faith. Someone should have asked Zakir if he supported Malay privileges. He would have spun faster than our washing machines to get out of that one!
Zakir Naik’s parting remark is to advocate an Umno and PAS coalition government. I suggest to his opponents for his next concert, ask him if he supports racism and racial privileges. Show him Umno’s track record of corruption and ask him if such a party can be Islamic.
Very sadly, Zakir Naik’s concerts were like the Back Street Boys' revival shows, all packed out. Forty thousand people attended his last show.
This is simply an indication of what Islam is for many of us ― nothing but a cheap thrill. It’s all about the numbers and the humiliation of other religions. Muslims need to rise above this cesspool and become compassionate human beings.
*This is the personal opinion of the columnist.
http://www.themalaymailonline.com/opinion/farouk-a.-peru/article/zakir-naik-and-the-cheapening-of-islam