Showing posts with label Threats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Threats. Show all posts

Tuesday, 1 May 2018

Get down to the real job

Malaysia should deal with actual problems instead of manufacturing fear and threats. 

  • SHARING THE NATION
  • Sunday, 1 Oct 2017

  • Zainah Anwar featured in Harvard Law exhibit
    THE Malaysian Government better get its message right, fast. Just a week ago, the Foreign Minister told the UN General Assembly that Malaysia plans to introduce a resolution to “negate the propagation of extremism and radicalisation”; that a Global Movement of Moderates (GMM) should “douse the flame of hatred and stem the influence of extreme and myopic ideas of intolerance, xenophobia and racial hatred”.
    He went on to state: “It is imperative for communities of different race, religion and culture to band together in seeking common peaceful aspirations and celebrate our diversity rather than be influenced, and enticed into extremist traps.”
    Alas, on home ground, extreme and myopic displays of intolerance wreak havoc day after day. And this supposedly moderate government remains silent or is complicit.
    First was the ban on the annual Better Beer Festival. City Hall said the decision was made “due to the political sensitivity surrounding the event”.
    PAS had claimed such a festival was an affront to the religious sensitivities of the Muslims, would encourage immorality and lead to criminal acts, free sex and rape. And to boot, it would turn Kuala Lumpur into the vice capital of Asia! Never mind the lack of evidence.
    This festival has taken place the last five years, and the little Napoleons in City Hall never saw it fit to first investigate the validity of the complaint before slapping the ban.
    The outrage caused perhaps led the police to state that it was cancelled on security grounds as some militants planned to sabotage the event.
    However, the Immigration director-general immediately undermined this reasoning by announcing that the Deputy Prime Minister had instructed him not to allow individuals to enter the country for the beer festival and a gay party.
    What gay party? No one seems to know.
    Perhaps the strategy was to manufacture yet another threat to the sensitivities of easily offended Muslims.
    But we, the thinking rakyat, wondered how the Immigration Department, supposedly working together with Jakim, would identify these “undesirables” arriving at 137 entry points and serve them with the “Not To Land” notice? By the size of their beer bellies? Tattoos on their arms and legs? Sleeveless T-shirts and earrings in one ear? Pray tell.
    Ah, but we are not supposed to question, challenge, think or use logic.
    I wish they would also find answers and take serious action in dealing with the many social ills that afflict Kelantan disproportionately – drug addiction, incest, HIV/AIDS, deadbeat husbands and fathers.
    It could very well be the vice capital of Malaysia – except that these vices are hidden from public view or take place across the border or out at sea.
    And oh, how about dealing with the endless cycle of poverty?
    Kelantan remains the poorest state in the country with a GDP per capita of only RM12,812. Even, Kedah, the second poorest state has a per capita income 50% higher.
    See, if we are serious and sincere about caring for Islam, we will do more to deal with real problems taking place, instead of manufacturing threats and insults. Obviously, this PAS action is about politics, not Islam.
    Then came the viral video of a man dressed in Arab-style jubah and skull-cap lecturing patrons at a coffeeshop on the sensitivities of the Muslim majority residents in Flora Damansara. No drugs, no alcohol, no sex, no “bare” dress, please, we are Muslims.
    I wish they would show the same concern for Muslim teenagers, neglected by parents with no time, no money, no parental skills to bring them up with love and guidance, the dropouts, the drug addicts, the Mat Rempit.
    Could their needs be met in more constructive and healthy ways at the community level? Could the mosque committee and the residents association be mobilised to provide support to neglected and troubled teenagers? Could the fire at the tahfiz in Kuala Lumpur be prevented if there had been more healthy community engagement with these delinquent teenagers, many of whom come from broken homes, obviously in need of support?
    And if this was not enough, then came the viral post of a launderette in Muar that banned non-Muslims from using its facilities.
    The owner said he was only trying to be a good Muslim; totally ignorant of the racial and religious slur such an action constitutes in a world where the gross injustices of apartheid in South Africa and segregation in southern United States, racial profiling, discrimination and exclusion on the basis of one’s skin colour or one’s religion remain topics of heated debate.
    Right-minded Malaysians got worked up because we do not want to see our country plunge deeper into a black hole of segregation over race and religion.
    To top it all, on Monday came the news that the renowned Turkish scholar and writer, Mustafa Akyol, was detained for speaking without a permit by the religious authorities.
    All this bad news in a supposedly moderate Muslim country that wants to lead the world in a global movement to end intolerance, extremism and racial hatred?
    All these events lead me to ask yet again, where and how did these Muslims study their Islam? How could someone who lives in a multi-racial society think that his big loud notice that non-Muslims are not welcome into his shop was him just being a “good Muslim”, and would not cause offence to those he has excluded for their lack of cleanliness on the basis of their religion.
    How could a religion that teaches its adherents to seek knowledge – even if it was in China, that absorbed Greek logic into its tradition and exported it to the Latin West, that embraces pluralism and demands its believers to think and reflect, be so abused today that its adherents cannot deal with differences and diversity?
    How could a country that had once embraced pluralism, that sells “Malaysia Truly Asia” to the world in recognition and celebration of the wealth that its diversity brings, create a space and a climate where bigotry rears its ugly head, seemingly on a daily basis?
    The truth is new norms are deliberately and strategically being created to manufacture fear and insecurity for political gain.
    Just look at the seminars organised by various units under Jakim on the threat of liberalism and pluralism and deviant thinking.
    Taxpayers’ money is being used to preach intolerance and hatred and no one in authority is monitoring this, not even the GMM Secretariat that wants to export its moderation.
    The Sultan of Johor’s immediate intervention that there is no place for such extremism in the state of Johor is critical. Someone in authority needs to speak out to stop this headlong plunge into racial and religious apartheid.
    Perhaps the Sultans, as the heads of Islam and symbol of unity in their respective states, will provide the urgent leadership needed to take principled positions on what is in the best interest of Malaysia in matters of religion.
    Given the way things are going in the name of Islam, it is obvious that those in political and religious authority have failed to curb the growing extremism and intolerance.
    If leaders cannot lead, then the vacuum will be filled by others who are very willing to take the lead and force the politicians to follow.

    https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/columnists/sharing-the-nation/2017/10/01/get-down-to-the-real-job-malaysia-should-deal-with-actual-problems-instead-of-manufacturing-fear-and/



    Tuesday, 29 November 2016

    Maria: No idea where I was held

    KUALA LUMPUR: Bersih 2.0 chairman Maria Chin Abdullah was kept in solitary confinement with no contact with the outside world.


    Tuesday, 29 November 2016

    Maria: No idea where I was held

    KUALA LUMPUR: Bersih 2.0 chairman Maria Chin Abdullah was kept in solitary confinement with no contact with the outside world.

    Each time she left her cell, she was blindfolded with large, blackened goggles. She also did not know where she was held in the first place.
    Those were some of the conditions faced by Maria during her 10-day detention at an undisclosed location under the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012.
    Maria was released late yesterday after she was brought to Bukit Aman.
    “I didn’t really know where I was. This was meant to scare me because it is in an undisclosed place. The interrogations happened every day for long hours.
    “But I think the saving grace was when Suhakam came and I want to thank them,” she told reporters at Dataran Merdeka.
    Maria said the human rights watchdog helped reduce the type of tough interrogations that she had to go through.
    She said she would continue with her work with Bersih.
    “There is a possibility of another detention as they have started a second investigation on me.
    “If they do it, they are really silly to continue harassing us. The rally went peacefully,” she said, adding that the whole money story did not hold water.
    She said the police knew it and they had her organisation’s bank account statements.
    “They have everything. We have even published them on our website,” Maria said.
    Meanwhile, during her address at Dataran Merdeka, she denied receiving funds from the Soros Foundation.
    “Bersih doesn’t take money from the Soros Foundation.
    “They don’t believe me. They think we have an account with RM3.2bil,” she said, adding that her detention was meant to frighten them so that they would not go ahead with the rally but the people had become brave.
    “They went ahead. I hope all of you continue to support Bersih and our demands,” she added.
    “We want clean elections and to reform the institutions in our country.”
    Her children – Azumin, Aziman and Azemi – said they were extremely happy now that their mother had been released.
    “We really did not have any idea that she would be released today.
    “When mum’s lawyer Datuk S. Ambiga called us and we heard her voice, we couldn’t contain our happiness.
    “The whole family is overjoyed,” said Azumin Mohamad Yunus.

    Non-Muslims warned to stay out of Hadi’s Bill or face consequences

    KUALA LUMPUR: Non-Muslims have been warned to stay out of PAS’ proposed amendments to Syariah law, or face resistance on proposed amendments to stop the unilateral conversion of children to Islam.
    Tuesday, 29 November 2016


    PAS secretary-general Datuk Takiyuddin Hassan said Muslims would oppose amendments to the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act if non-Muslims continue to interfere with the proposed amendments to Syariah law.
    “We must play fair. Don’t interfere with the rights of Muslims and make it difficult for us.
    “If you want to play this way, then we too can work against the proposed law reform,” he told a press conference at the party headquarters yesterday.
    Takiyuddin said Muslim and non-Muslim communities should reach a compromise.
    Amendments to the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act mainly concern the custody and conversion of children from a civil marriage where one spouse has converted to Islam.
    Last Monday, the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) (Amendment) Bill 2016 was tabled in Parliament for its first reading.
    If passed, it will ensure a child’s religion remains as that of the father and mother, prior to the conversion of either parent.
    On Thursday, PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang tabled a motion on a Private Member’s Bill, seeking to give Syariah Courts more power to mete out heavier punishments, short of the death sentence.
    However, both the second reading of the law reform amendments and Abdul Hadi’s motion were postponed till the Dewan Rakyat sitting in March next year.
    Takiyuddin chided DAP adviser Lim Kit Siang for criticising MCA president Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai’s stand over Hadi’s Bill.
    “The MCA president’s statement is very positive when he said that his party would consider reviewing its stand on the Bill if it was carried by the Government.
    “It is disappointing that Lim Kit Siang blamed Liow for not having principles,” he said, adding that Lim was confusing the rakyat over the Bill.
    MCA religious harmony bureau chairman Datuk Seri Ti Lian Ker said there was no such thing as quid pro quo arrangements on protecting Malaysians’ constitutional rights.
    “This tit-for-tat threat against non-Muslims hits below the belt. It is clear that PAS’ intended maltreatment and oppression against ethnic and religious minorities, and women, will be no different from the likes of Islamic State,” he said.

    http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/11/29/pas-threatens-titfortat-move-nonmuslims-warned-to-stay-out-of-hadis-bill-or-face-consequences/