Thursday 26 October 2017

New churches or temples not allowed

BRUNEI is a small country with a population of only about 400,000, of whom 67% are Muslims, 13% Buddhists, 10% Christians and 10% other religions.
Do the one third of non-Muslims in that country still enjoy religious freedom?
Monday, 3 Oct 2016
Still standing: The 100-year-old ‘Tokong China’ situated at the centre of Bandar Seri Begawan. — Sin Chew Daily
Still standing: The 100-year-old ‘Tokong China’ situated at the centre of Bandar Seri Begawan. — Sin Chew Daily

There are three churches in Brunei, and in their day-to-day lives, the Christians do feel the impact of the hudud law.
There had been calls on social media earlier for the city hall of Miri, just across the western border in Sarawak, to demolish a church
The Bruneian netizens had claimed that the church did not care for the feelings of Muslims on the other side of the border, and that it was disrespectful, displaying banners in praise of Jesus and God.
When the Sin Chew Daily team arrived at a local Chinese restaurant to buy food, we met an old Christian couple from Sarawak, who had lived in Brunei for 55 years.
We started to talk about the conditions of Christians in the oil-rich Sultanate.
They told us there were only three larger churches in Brunei, namely St Andrew’s (Anglican), St George’s (Catholic) and St John’s in Kuala Belait.
“The government will no longer issue new permits for the construction of churches but the ones completed earlier can still be retained,” they said.
The one the old couple attend is not an independent church building but a shophouse-type meeting hall.
They said while these meeting halls were allowed to remain, they could not apply to expand into full-fledged churches.
In other words, there are only three independent church buildings in the country and the number will not be increased.
We travelled to Bandar Seri Begawan to visit St Andrew’s and St George’s, both within a stone’s throw from each other on a side street diagonally opposite the Islamic criminal court.
While a cross was seen on top of both buildings, there were no religious banners on the external walls or any place visible from outside the buildings.
At St George’s, we could see many Catholics attending Friday mass inside while St Andrew’s, being an Anglican church, was all quiet.
The couple told us local Christians were allowed to hold low-key Christmas celebrations inside the churches or at homes, but not outdoors or at a shopping mall. Christmas decorations and sending greeting cards are seen as offensive to Muslims and against the country’s law.
Non-Muslims are prohibited by law to preach to Muslims or atheists.
Offenders can be fined up to B$20,000 (RM60,000) or up to five years’ imprisonment, or both.
The Brunei government has also listed 19 terms for the exclusive use of Muslims only, and Christians are not allowed to use the Malay version of the Bible.
Currently, there is only one Chinese temple recognised by the government: the over 100-year-old Tokong China in the city centre.
Other than that, local residents told us there is another unregistered resident-type Buddhist altar which could be closed down anytime if someone were to report it to enforcement authorities.
“This is the only Chinese temple here, a 100-year-old relic permanently protected under the order of the previous Sultan.
“Because of the royal order, this temple has been able to survive,” a local Chinese told us.
Similarly, no permits for the construction of new Chinese temples will be issued by the government.
In the meantime, a Bruneian Muslim told Sin Chew Daily they were also not allowed to celebrate Valentine’s Day and many youngsters have the wrong impression that Valentine’s is a Christian festival.
In addition, Muslim parents are banned from entrusting their children into the care of non-Muslim families.
As for non-Muslim parents, many are worried that if their children get converted, they might lose the custodial rights of their children. — Sin Chew Daily/Asia News Network
http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/10/03/new-churches-or-temples-not-allowed-only-completed-places-of-worship-to-remain-in-brunei

Wednesday 25 October 2017

Uphold Federal Constitution and Rukunegara to preserve national harmony

TOLERANCE has been commonly and consistently propagated around the world as an important tool for people of different beliefs, ethnicity and nationalities to coexist and work together for the betterment of their nation.
Wednesday, 25 Oct 2017
In multireligious and multi-ethnic societies like Malaysia, tolerance among the different communities is essential and achievable if there is mutual effort from all parties concerned.
Religious beliefs, which are the source of moral and ethical fundamentals in society, must be duly respected through mutual tolerance.
Islam emphasises that its followers should be considerate and tolerant to others, including non-Muslims. Likewise, non-Muslims are required to have a sense of tolerance towards Muslims in the same manner as Islam requires Muslims to have tolerance towards them.
The Rukunegara, which was introduced following the May 13, 1969 incident, is aimed at achieving national and racial harmony and unity, the key ingredient for the success and stability of the country.
An important component of the Rukunegara is the principle of good behaviour which encompasses the duty to be considerate of others and not to belittle or mock others’ religious beliefs and cultural practices.
Preferences based on religion only, such as Muslims-only laundry shop, Muslims-only hair salon, Muslims-only patrons of a restaurant, Muslims-only cutlery and Muslims-only sitting arrangements at certain public places, among others, should not be tolerated as this would cause racial disharmony.
Likewise, advertisements that are discriminatory or offensive in nature against any particular race, religion or group in the country must be avoided.
Discrimination on the basis of religion and race is against the Federal Constitution. Article 3(1) of the Constitution says that Islam is the religion of the Federation but provides that “other religions may be practised in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation”. Article 8(1) provides for equality before the law for all persons and Article 11(1) gives every person the right to profess and practise his or her religion.
These constitutional provisions must be respected and upheld.
ASHGAR ALI ALI MOHAMED
Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws
International Islamic University Malaysia

http://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2017/10/25/uphold-federal-constitution-and-rukunegara-to-preserve-national-harmony/

Understanding the significance of the Rulers’ statement

WHAT is the real significance of the statement issued by the Keeper of the Rulers’ Seal on behalf of the Conference of Rulers on Oct 10?
Wednesday, 25 Oct 2017
One, it reaffirms the fundamental importance of unity and harmony in multi-religious Malaysia and demonstrates why respect for one another and for the dignity of all human beings is imperative. At the same time, the Rulers’ statement rejects unequivocally extremism and divisiveness in our society.
Two, by reasserting their authority as Head of Islam in their respective states, the Sultans have made it explicitly clear that they do not want the religion to be associated with exclusiveness and bigotry. They want Islam to be presented and practised as it has always been – a religion of tolerance, moderation and inclusiveness.
Three, to bring these and other such values to the fore, Malaysians, the Rulers emphasised, should adhere to the principles of the Federal Constitution and the spirit of the Rukunegara. The Rukunegara is described as the nation’s guiding compass.
The Rulers have made their stand and the people should now come out in full support.
DR CHANDRA MUZAFFAR
Chairman
Board of Trustees
Yayasan 1Malaysia

http://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2017/10/25/understanding-the-significance-of-the-rulers-statement/

Monday 16 October 2017

Sultan revokes Zamihan's preaching credentials

PETALING JAYA: The Sultan of Selangor has instructed the Selangor Islamic Council (Mais) to revoke the preaching credentials of Zamihan Mat Zin.
Monday, 16 Oct 2017
Royal Court of Selangor secretary Hanafisah Jais said Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah had consulted the council on Monday before issuing the instructions to Mais.
Hanafisah said Mais had been instructed to remove Zamihan from the Selangor Tauliah Committee.
"This action follows a religious lecture by Zamihan that contained words that are racist, ill-mannered and excessively critical of the royal institution.
She said that Sultan Sharafuddin also instructed that lectures at mosques and surau be recorded for monitoring purposes.
Sultan Sharafuddin also instructed that the volume of loudspeakers during lectures be lowered, except for the call of Azan and the recitation of Quran verses, she said.
“The Malay rulers are of the opinion that the image of Islam as the federal religion is a religion that should encourage its followers to be tolerant, moderate, inclusive and not polluted by extreme actions,” said Hanafisah.
She added that Sultan Sharafuddin reminded all Selangor citizens to respect the main principles in the Federal Constitution for the country’s harmony and peace.
Zamihan has come under fire for allegedly criticising Johor Ruler Sultan Ibrahim Ibni Almarhum Sultan Iskandar over the Muslims-only launderette issue.
In a video clip that went viral, Zamihan also made disparaging remarks against the Chinese by calling them “unhygienic.”
Zamihan was released after a two-day remand in investigations for sedition on Saturday (Oct 14.)

Read more at http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2017/10/16/selangor-sultan-withdraws-zamihan-preaching-credentials

Political impartiality of civil service

IN a recent address to civil servants Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak likened the inseparability of the government and the civil service (known in Malaysian law as "public service") to the proverbial "ibarat aur dengan tebing" (like the bamboo and river bank). 
Posted on 16 October 2017 - 09:06am
True indeed. Because, as he alluded to earlier, civil servants develop and implement government policies. And serve the government of the day, as the prime minister noted. He went on to lambast, "particularly the Opposition", for insulting or slandering civil servants with "those nasty words … directed at the whole government and vice versa".
"Hence, we should be grateful for the benefits that we are enjoying and not allow this country to fall into their hands as they do not appreciate the toil and contributions of the civil servants," he added.
This sends the clearest signal yet – that civil servants must pitch for the ruling party and vote against the Opposition. A message no doubt of the forthcoming, looming general election.
How does the prime minister's clarion call to abandon its neutrality match up to the fundamental tenets and ethos of the civil service in our constitutional construct? Let's start at the beginning.
The Reid Commission – which drafted our Federal Constitution – said: "The first essential for ensuring an efficient administration is that the political impartiality of the public service should be recognised and safe-guarded". Its continuous existence is assured only if it maintained its distance "irrespective of changes in the political complexion of the government of the day". The safeguards were embedded in the Federal Constitution by the establishment of independent service commissions (Article 132). The Reid Commission emphasised that these service commissions must "be completely free from government influence and direction of any kind".
Reinforcing this independence, the position of individual public servants is constitutionally protected by placing restrictions on their dismissals and reduction in rank (Article 135), by ensuring impartial treatment of federal employees (Article 136) and by pension rights (Article 147).
The Reid Commission has been referenced in decisions of our higher courts – Susie Teoh Eng Huat v. Kadhi, Pasir Mas [1990], PP v Yuneswaran [2015]; as have reports of the Inter-Governmental Committee that fleshed the detailed constitutional safeguards for the formation of Malaysia (Mohammad Tufail v Ting Check Sii [2009]).
A bloated civil service
The prime minister levied a further charge against the Opposition: For accusing the country's civil service as "bloated".
"If they are in power, with arrogance, they would want to reduce by half the number of civil servants", he added.
This conceals the concern that the government has itself expressed. In February 2017, the deputy finance minister warned that the annual payroll was already at RM81 billion while pension payments were RM19 billion a year.
The deputy minister rolled out the figures: One civil servant for every 19.37 people in Malaysia. Contrasted with 1 to 71.4 (Singapore); 1 to 110 (Indonesia); 1 to 50 (South Korea); 1 to 108 (China); 1 to 28 (Japan); 1 to 84 (Russia); and 1 to 118 (Britain).
Expectedly, political parties are wary when dealing with our civil servants. After all, they constitute a sizeable mass of the voting electorate: Reportedly 1.6 million. And predominantly Malays – approximately 79%.
A dip in the votes of such a sizeable electorate could spell consequences. Political strategists predict, if Malay votes were to dip by 15% – the Opposition could gain another 34 seats in parliament. And deny the ruling party's 112-seats majority.
Understandably then, political parties vie strenuously to reach out to this massive vote bank. Especially now that their hitherto support for the ruling party may no longer be assured, according to political commentators. But how this support is garnered is the issue.
Conjuring up the spectre of a loss of their jobs if the Opposition wins (half of 1.6 million) and the fear and hatred that this seeks to engender, violates the basic tenet that a civil servant "must serve the government, whatever its political persuasion, to the best of your ability in a way which maintains political impartiality": Civil Service Code of the UK. And, more critically, injures the fundamental precept of an independent public service firmly anchored in the Federal Constitution.
Gurdial, a former University of Malaya law professor, is now a practising legal consultant.

Sunday 15 October 2017

Sultan Ibrahim decrees JAIJ to stop dealing with Jakim following Zamihan video (Updated)

PETALING JAYA: Johor's Sultan Ibrahim Sultan Iskandar has criticised controversial preacher Zamihan Mat Zin and decreed the Johor Islamic Religious Department (JAIJ) to stop its dealings with the Malaysian Islamic Development Department (Jakim) in relation to his remarks.

Posted on 14 October 2017 - 06:14pm
Last updated on 15 October 2017 - 12:05pm
Sultan of Johor, Sultan Ibrahim Sultan Iskandar

"I take him (Zamihan) as an empty vessel without brains," His Majesty said in his speech at Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia's (UTHM) 17th convocation ceremony at Batu Pahat, today.
His response came after Zamihan, believed to be a former Jakim officer, had criticised Sultan Ibrahim over the case of a Muslim-only launderette in Muar.
The Johor ruler pointed out that Zamihan was critical of his actions as well as the muftis following their views on the matter.
His Majesty also labelled him a liar for attempting to deny his actions following public outcry.
"It appears that the ustaz is good at lying. How are we to learn from him then?
"After this, just preach in front of a mirror to learn about yourself.
"If he is truly a Jakim preacher, I have no idea where they picked him from and after this, I will direct JAIJ not to waste their time with Jakim," His Majesty added.
A video which has since gone viral had shown Zamihan rebuking a "Sultan" for his statement on the Muslim-friendly laundrette which, according to him, had only made the issue bigger.
The video, which had been republished by several media organisations, had also shown Zamihan taking a hit at the Chinese community, deeming them dirty as they do not wash up after urinating or defecating.
In an immediate response, Deputy Home Minister Datuk Nur Jazlan Mohamed said the ministry would probe the matter and take immediate action over the speech.
Zamihan in a statement, last Wednesday, said it was impossible for him to utter words degrading or insulting Sultan Ibrahim, but added that he seeks forgiveness if his words had offended the Sultan.
Meanwhile, the Malaysian Islamic Development Department (Jakim) director-general Tan Sri Othman Mustapha will be seeking an audience with the Johor Sultan following his Majesty's decree to the Johor Islamic Religious Department (JAIJ) to stop its dealings with the national religious body.
In a brief statement, today, Othman said while he respects the decree issued by His Majesty, he along with Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom will immediately request to seek an audience with the Johor Ruler to clarify the issue involving controversial preacher Zamihan Mat Zin.
The preacher was remanded for two days from Thursday in connection with sedition investigations over his speech and was released today.
http://www.thesundaily.my/news/2017/10/15/sultan-ibrahim-decrees-jaij-stop-dealing-jakim-following-zamihan-video-updated


Related articles


Know your constitutional rights as citizens

MOST Malaysians are unaware of their rights as citizens of this country. They simply accept as gospel all the pronouncements concerning their rights and restrictions by the authorities.
Posted on 9 October 2017 - 07:23pm
Last updated on 9 October 2017 - 07:40pm
Citizens' rights are enshrined in the Constitution as well as in the Native Customary Laws and in the Syariah for Muslims. They are regulatory principles based on the precepts of justice, as mechanisms to govern individual and communal behaviour and interactions.
The Legislature, one of the three branches of governance, besides the Executive and Judiciary, is the august body made up of people's representatives that formulates and amends the Constitution from time to time to suit the prevailing circumstances. Amendments are made by way of a two-thirds majority, in the interest of justice and not based on the tyranny of the majority to effect sectarian ­advantage.
Various instruments of governance are emplaced to ensure that citizens' rights are not violated. The Judiciary is the supreme institution that oversees such issues in addition to criminal and civil matters.
Judicial review is an integral part of ensuring respect and observance of citizens' rights. A judiciary that acts as a check and balance of executive powers can ensure that the citizens' constitutional rights are not violated. A citizen can initiate due process to reclaim his or her rights, but the courts are the ultimate arbiter. Thus, courts that are impervious to extraneous influence are a prerequisite for the rightful observance of citizens' rights.
But this is not always the case for political expediency may result in the manipulation of the various instruments of governance to deny the citizens' lawful rights. Therefore, the citizens may not have recourse to these institutions that are supposed to protect their rights because these instruments of governance by virtue of their establishment are subservient to the dictates of the Executive.
Citizens are easily intimidated because of their ignorance and tend to accept the directives from the authorities as gospel and sacrosanct.
A case in point is the Sabah and Sarawak immigration control, which is part of the 20-point agreement in joining Malaysia. But this immigration control has been used to deny access to Malaysians from West Malaysia on innocent passage to discharge their constitutionally sanctioned political activities on the spurious grounds of posing as security risks.
In fact, the intention of immigration control is regulatory and not envisaged as punitive restriction. With proper documents, one should be able to move freely in these two states without unwarranted restrictions. The irony is that Malaysians from Sabah and Sarawak have unrestricted access to all the facilities and are free to work and stay in Peninsular Malaysia.
Then there is the right of individuals to undertake legally sanctioned business enterprises and are free to operate in a manner they see fit. As long as they comply with the licensing requirements they should not be coerced to submit to extraneous untoward non-business demands.
On the same vein, a citizen's right of domicile is irrevocable except on grounds of criminal or security related activities. In such cases he would be incarcerated or exiled to other parts of the country as the court deems fit.
But for the law-abiding citizen, he or she cannot be evicted from the state in which he is domiciled by anyone, even by those from the highest echelons of society. It is his/her constitutional right to live in the state of his/her choice.
Freedom of expression and the right to dissent have long been contentious issues between citizens and officialdom. The right to express one's ideas or thoughts in a written, verbal or visual format is circumscribed by various legislative measures such as the Seditious Act, the Official Secret Acts and the Police Act in Conformity with prevailing political sentiments.
An informed citizenry is crucial to ensure that its rights be given credence and due respect so that it could act as a check and balance in ensuring good governance and the protection of its constitutional rights.
Professor Emeritus Datuk Dr Mohamed Ghouse Nasuruddin is an honorary fellow at the Centre for Policy Research and International Studies (CenPRIS) and Associate Professor Dr Azeem Fazwan Ahmad Farouk is director at the Centre for Policy Research and International Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang
http://www.thesundaily.my/news/2017/10/09/know-your-constitutional-rights-citizens

Thursday 12 October 2017

Zamihan has a history of targeting Christians, moderate Muslims

PETALING JAYA: The Muslim preacher Zamihan Mat Zin, who has been arrested in a sedition probe for remarks he made against a Malay ruler, has a track record of targeting Christians and those he labels “liberal” or “moderate” Muslims.

Wednesday, 11 Oct 2017
Most of his statements can be found in a series of video clips uploaded to the “OnLine Majlis Ilmu” YouTube channel, which has more than 27,000 subscribers.
He has trained his eye on other, more moderate Islamic non-governmental organisations like Sisters in Islam as well.
In one video, uploaded in April, he labelled lawyer and activist Siti Kassim an apostate.
He said this was because Christians were “kafirs” (infidels).
“How can we wish them (Merry Christmas)?” he said.
The Pertubuhan Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah Malaysia (Aswaja) president seemed aware of the incendiary nature of his statements, adding that “Let them call us racists.
“We are crude and tough on this matter because this is about akidah (creed),” he added.
Zamihan also trained his barbs on moderate Muslims, urging the audience in his YouTube channel to not follow the teachings of moderate Islam, which he labelled as “narrow”.
“This is about akidah. Festive celebrations cannot be underestimated at all. Do not follow those who practise ‘narrow’ religions, and those who simply issue fatwas.
“They don’t even know a thing about Christians, and they want to say that ‘It's okay, we are a pluralistic, multiracial and multi-ethnic country, so we must be open’,” he added.
Zamihan was under investigation after he had allegedly said, in a more recent video, that it was wrong of Johor Ruler Sultan Ibrahim Ibni Almarhum Sultan Iskandar to prohibit a Muslim-only laundrette from operating in the state.
In the same video, he described Chinese people as being “unhygienic”.
This came after the Johor Sultan said he was unhappy with a “Muslim-only” launderette operating in the state.
In an exclusive report by The Star on Sept 27, His Majesty said: "I cannot accept this nonsense. This is Johor, which belongs to Bangsa Johor and it belongs to all races and faiths. This is a progressive, modern and moderate state."
The owner of the launderette later apologised for his actions and opened his door to all customers.
On Sept 28, the Raja Muda of Perlis, Tuanku Syed Faizuddin Putra Jamalullai, visited a similar launderette in Kangar with his mufti Datuk Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin to tell its owner why his business model was not acceptable.
The 36-year-old owner then opened his outlet to all customers, too.
In a statement on Wednesday, Zamihan said he would take legal action against news portals if they do not retract and apologise for their articles over the video, claiming he never mentioned the name of the Johor Sultan in his recent video and neither did he use any abusive or seditious words.
He said that he would give a number of news portals, as well as former minister Datuk Zaid Ibrahim, seven days to retract their articles and to publicly apologise to him.
“If they fail to do so, I will take legal action against them for defaming me without prejudice," Zamihan added.
The Home Ministry on Tuesday said that it would also be investigating Zamihan over the viral video.
He was arrested later on Wednesday.

Read more at http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2017/10/11/zamihan-has-a-history-of-targeting-christians-and-moderate-muslims/

Wednesday 11 October 2017

Concerns raised by Rulers timely, say moderates

PETALING JAYA: Moderates have welcomed the concerns raised by the Malay Rulers about the country’s unity and harmony, hailing them as being timely.

Wednesday, 11 Oct 2017
Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) chairman Tan Sri Razali Ismail said the recent actions and statements in the name of Islam, which have the effects of portraying Islam as an intolerant and factious religion, contradicted the aspirations of the Federal Constitution and the Rukunegara.
“This injunction by the Malay Rulers reaffirms the dignity of every Malaysian and underlines the country’s unwavering commitment towards a more inclusive nation.
“Suhakam calls on individuals and other interest groups to stop acting against the spirit of tolerance, which can result in confusion and disunity, and to seriously take heed of the Rulers’ statement and injunction,” Razali said.
“Malaysia’s diversity of its people, especially in the context of racial heritage, religion and all the attendant diversities must not merely be 'tolerated' by everyone but must be accepted as a given and therefore respected.
“We have no place for any holier-than-thou attitude nor for any superiority complex in any context,” said the former international trade and industry minister.
Rafidah said each person must be allowed to keep their own faith, adding that Islam invokes Muslims to subscribe to the principles of moderation.
“More importantly, no one should make our diversity a political capital in order to win the support of the gallery, and to achieve personal or group or base ulterior motives.
“Every Malaysian should be the best person possible, and those doing it now, must stop being his or her brother’s and sister’s keeper,” she said.
Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Tan Sri Joseph Kurup said the actions by extremists and bigots are destructive and not conducive to nation-building.
“We will continue to implement various programmes to strengthen unity in our multi-religious and multi-ethnic society based on the Federal Constitution and the five principles of the Rukun Negara.
“It is desirable for all Malaysians to pay heed to the noble advice of our Rulers which is to inculcate among ourselves the concept of tolerance and acceptance,” he said.
Zubedy founder Anas Zubedy said he was glad that the Rulers raised the issue.
“We have to pay attention to the ambition and goals of the Rukun Negara.
“Recently, I have been promoting the idea that we have to bring the Rukun Negara to the forefront, and make sure we use its ambitions and principles as our parameters, regardless of whether you are a politician, business leader, religious leader or citizen,” he added.
Moderation advocate Tawfik Ismail said while the Rulers are the heads of religion in their respective states, it appears that in the last few years, politicians have ignored the Rulers’ powers over religion.
The son of Malaysia’s second deputy prime minister, Tun Dr Ismail Abdul Rahman, added that the level of tolerance among Malaysians is quite high and that people are too busy making a living to worry about the rhetoric.
Islamic Renaissance Front chairman Dr Ahmad Farouk Musa said that part of the preamble to the Rukunegara clearly states liberal value. 
However, “liberal” has been demonised to mean areligious and decadent, he said.
“This part of the preamble can be translated as: ‘Guaranteeing a liberal approach towards her rich and varied cultural traditions’.
“The word ‘liberal’ is used in the context of something positive and beneficial to Malaysia’s ambitions to becoming a united, happy and prosperous country.
“When we demonise a dignified terminology, this is what we are witnessing – a society that has become intolerant to diverse opinions and lifestyles; a society that has difficulty in embracing multiculturalism and plurality,” he said.
Related stories:

Read more at http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2017/10/11/concerns-raised-by-rulers-timely-say-moderates